What can your setup actually do?

AI has a reviewed brief of my role, priorities, preferences, and constraints.

I have used that brief in real work and corrected any wrong assumptions.

I can identify the applicable source, its owner, date, and current status.

My workflow has passed tests for conflicting sources, missing answers, and instructions hidden in source material.

Relevant projects, decisions, and relationships have a durable, source-linked record.

I have resumed a real task from those records without rebuilding its history.

Selected inputs have an agreed capture destination and a review owner.

I have reviewed real captured inputs, retained their sources, and separated accepted commitments from suggestions.

Accepted commitments have owners, dates or explicit uncertainty, and a place to track status.

I have reconciled real work against the task system and followed an open item through to completion.

An action matrix names permitted access, Auto Execute, Draft & Wait, Never Automate, and the approver.

Approval, prohibition, and permission-revocation behavior have passed tests in the actual workflow.

One recurring workflow has a procedure, source requirements, and a definition of an acceptable result.

Someone has followed that procedure in real work and corrected the gaps it exposed.

An assistant has a bounded task, inputs, output, review queue, and stop conditions.

It has completed at least two actual operating cycles over at least two weeks, with results and corrections recorded.

A tested workflow has a justified automation decision, including choosing human-assisted operation when appropriate.

The chosen mode has passed a real run, an exception test, and a stop/recovery check; the decision remains reviewed.

The workflow has a review owner, costs, portable records, backup, and recovery instructions.

I have reviewed actual use, corrected a failure, restored a backup, resumed a task from records, and tested portability or recorded its remaining gap.